Hello All:
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
- Edmund Burke
Since it appears that the “Sandwich-grabbing attorney” appears to have been stricken with delusions of granduer, and acts like she’s defending OJ, instead of 6″ of dirt, I needed to create a special page just to post the bias, predjudice, and twisted insanity of my lawsuit. It started out as simply trying to get a couple of maniacal assholes off of my back and it has mushroomed into an all out power struggle. It isn’t even about the 6″ of dirt anymore, not for the sandwich-grabbing attorney at least. I don’t think she knows what it’s about.
She filed a motion for a status conference, and, of course, her motion was immediately granted. I’m hoping the judge will just rule against me, give me a “finding of facts,” so I can get this kicked up to the Appellate Court. I am not concerned about getting my appeal heard, as there are numerous court errors that make it a sure thing. For instance, not ONE of my motions has been granted, on the other hand, every motion the sandwich-grabbing attorney has filed has been granted. Interestingly, she was granted an additional 30 days, after the time limit to answer one of my pleadings, to file her response. What she didn’t have to do was file a motion for that extra 30 days, it was a “gift” from the court. How do I know that? Because in all of the copies of motions and pleadings I have been sent, there isn’t a single one that requests that additional time. So, it’s pretty obvious where this is going. It’s ok, I intend to let this play out, and let them play their political and corrupt games and bide my time until I get my case into the Appeals Court, and just hope that court isn’t as biased and predjudiced against people who represent themselves.
The sandwich-grabbing attorney is so arrogant, and sees me as nothing more than a bottom-feeder, simply because I do not have an attorney. Apparantly, the judge sees it the same way!! The status conference should be interesting.
But, I have a motion I am preparing, at the suggestion of the Arizona State Bar, that I intend to file before the conference. I want it in the court record, and transcripts, so the Appeals Court will see it for themselves, the denial of many of my rights, and the trial/court errors.
“Discovery” is a part of the natural course that any lawsuit or court action takes. I began to conduct my “discovery” as soon as the defendants were served, which is allowed according to the AZ Rules of Court. However, the sandwich-grabbing attorney didn’t think she had to follow the rules outlined for discovery, and refused to give me the documents I demanded be produced. I filed a motion for an order to compel her to give the documents to me and guess what? You guessed it! The judge denied my motion for that order. In layman’s terms, it appears that the attorney and the judge decided that the rules of court, pertaining to discovery, didn’t apply to me and they were exempt from following and/or enforcing the rules as well.
This has become a personal vendetta for the sandwich-grabbing attorney. I don’t think she even knows what my complaint is about, and I definitely don’t believe she even reads the pleadings I file, because she doesn’t have to; this case has already been decided!!
Regards,
Looking4trth
looking4trth
